When treatment goes wrong, many people assume that the poor outcome they face speaks for itself. In practice it does not, and understanding how to prove medical negligence is the key to knowing whether you have a claim worth pursuing. The law sets a demanding test, and meeting it depends on evidence rather than on how strongly a patient feels that they were let down. This article sets out what actually has to be established, the role that medical experts play, and the evidence that supports a claim, so that you can approach the question with a clear idea of what is involved.
Please call us now on 01603 672222 for a no-obligation conversation today or Click Here To Make An Online Enquiry.
“Simper Law gave my family honest and straightforward advice. In a difficult time they were professional and showed empathy. Above all else their client care was faultless. Thank you.”
What Has To Be Proven?
A claim rests on two separate things, and both must be established for it to succeed. The first is breach of duty, which means showing that the care fell below the standard of a reasonably competent professional in the relevant field. The second is causation, which means showing that this failing actually caused you harm.
It is not enough to prove one without the other. Care can be substandard yet cause no injury, and a serious injury can occur despite entirely competent care. Only where both breach and causation are established, and where the harm has led to a loss that can be compensated, does a claim succeed.
How Is The Standard Of Care Judged?
The standard is not perfection, and it is not judged with hindsight. A professional is measured against what a reasonably competent practitioner in their field would have done at the time, with the information then available. This is often described as the Bolam test, after the case that established it.
There is an important refinement. Where a practitioner acts in line with a practice accepted by a responsible body of professional opinion, they are generally not negligent, even if others would have done things differently. However, that opinion must stand up to logical scrutiny, and a court will not accept a practice that cannot be sensibly justified. Because this is a question of professional standards, it can only realistically be answered by another practitioner in the same field, which is where expert evidence becomes essential.
Why Is Causation Often The Hardest Part?
Causation is frequently where claims succeed or fail, and it is more demanding than people expect. It is not enough to show that the care was poor. You must show that the poor care made a difference to the outcome, in other words that the injury would probably have been avoided with proper treatment.
This can be particularly difficult where a patient was already unwell, because the question becomes whether the harm resulted from the negligence or from the underlying condition. If the same outcome would have occurred even with competent care, the claim fails despite the breach. In delayed diagnosis cases, for example, it must be shown that earlier diagnosis would have led to a materially better result, which itself requires careful medical evidence.
What Part Do Medical Experts Play?
Independent medical experts are central to proving a claim. They are instructed to give an objective opinion on the case, and their duty is to the court rather than to the person who instructs them.
Usually, experts are needed on both of the key questions. One or more experts in the relevant speciality address whether the care fell below an acceptable standard, and experts, sometimes in a different field, address causation and the extent of the injury. In a claim involving several aspects of care, several experts may be required. Their reports shape the claim, inform its value, and are tested by the other side, so instructing the right experts and asking them the right questions is a large part of the work.
What Evidence Supports A Claim?
The foundation of the evidence is your medical records, which document what was done and when, and which the experts rely upon. Obtaining and analysing the full records is one of the first steps in any claim.
Alongside the records, your own account matters. A clear statement of what you experienced, what you were told, and how the injury has affected you helps to build the picture, particularly on matters that the records do not capture, such as what was said during a consultation. Evidence of the consequences is also important, including proof of financial losses such as lost earnings and the cost of treatment, and, where relevant, statements from family members about the effect on your daily life. Keeping documents, receipts, and a note of events as they happen makes this far easier.
What Standard Of Proof Applies?
Medical negligence claims are civil claims, and they are decided on the balance of probabilities. This means you must show that your case is more likely than not to be correct, which is a lower standard than the one that applies in criminal cases.
Put simply, the evidence taken as a whole must show that it is more probable than not both that the care was negligent and that it caused your injury. It does not have to be proved beyond doubt. Even so, meeting this standard requires proper evidence, which is why a considered investigation matters more than the strength of anyone’s conviction about what happened.
Finding Out Whether Your Case Can Be Proven
The only reliable way to know whether a claim can be made out is to have the care assessed by a solicitor who handles these cases and, where appropriate, by an independent expert. Our team will obtain your records, identify what evidence is needed, and give you a straight view of whether the case can be proven before you commit to taking it further.
We offer a free initial conversation with no obligation, giving you the information you need before you decide how to proceed. To speak to a member of our medical negligence team, contact us on 01603 672222 for a no-obligation conversation today or Click Here To Make An Online Enquiry.
“From our first enquiry, we were looked after, put at ease and our business dealt with in an excellent manner. We were given confidence, so satisfied and would have no hesitation in recommending Simper law.”
